<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking Back Sunday &#8211;  New Again </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2009/06/28/taking-back-sunday-new-again-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2009/06/28/taking-back-sunday-new-again-2/</link>
	<description>The latest on the indie, alternative, and rock music scene including news, music, contest, interviews, and more. Best described as your favorite place to find new bands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:15:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2009/06/28/taking-back-sunday-new-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-32151</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drivenfaroff.com/?p=7096#comment-32151</guid>
		<description>This album seems like it was made for the masses. Made to sell tickets. Made to market, rather than pushing anything creativity. I am an old-time fan and yes I don&#039;t enjoy the album at all. But I appreciate that you recognize that.

But I don&#039;t think the band matured. Perhaps business wise, they have, since I would probably head in the same direction as well, more money. They are growing old, and still playing off their band name.

If the band is so different, and so many line-up changes, why are they still keeping the legendary band name? Only because it has equity with fans who remember the good times. I will take a few more listens to the album, but my initial perception was anything but awesome. 

And the only song I enjoy was the &quot;everything must go&quot; song, which seems to be the only one to reflect the personal voice of Adam. But the lyrics are palathetic  for the song. Really, compare to the past lyrical structures. 

Thanks for the review, but a 10? Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This album seems like it was made for the masses. Made to sell tickets. Made to market, rather than pushing anything creativity. I am an old-time fan and yes I don&#8217;t enjoy the album at all. But I appreciate that you recognize that.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think the band matured. Perhaps business wise, they have, since I would probably head in the same direction as well, more money. They are growing old, and still playing off their band name.</p>
<p>If the band is so different, and so many line-up changes, why are they still keeping the legendary band name? Only because it has equity with fans who remember the good times. I will take a few more listens to the album, but my initial perception was anything but awesome. </p>
<p>And the only song I enjoy was the &#8220;everything must go&#8221; song, which seems to be the only one to reflect the personal voice of Adam. But the lyrics are palathetic  for the song. Really, compare to the past lyrical structures. </p>
<p>Thanks for the review, but a 10? Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
