http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2007/07/11/good-morning-revival-review/ The latest on the indie, alternative, and rock music scene including news, music, contest, interviews, and more. Best described as your favorite place to find new bands. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:19:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2007/07/11/good-morning-revival-review/#comment-27945 Andrea Hubbell Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:19:28 +0000 http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2007/07/11/good-morning-revival-review/#comment-27945 You have a point, and I actually touched on that: "Or perhaps the band was trying to follow a trend that seems to have come about with many alternative bands, and change their style, something that is perfectly understandable." I just didn't think that they carried out the changes in a good manner, or that the new style was as appealing as the old one. You have a point, and I actually touched on that:
“Or perhaps the band was trying to follow a trend that seems to have come about with many alternative bands, and change their style, something that is perfectly understandable.”
I just didn’t think that they carried out the changes in a good manner, or that the new style was as appealing as the old one.

]]> http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2007/07/11/good-morning-revival-review/#comment-27944 aimes113 Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:14:17 +0000 http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2007/07/11/good-morning-revival-review/#comment-27944 Could the reason that it wasnt consitent, but had a new sound was because they wanted a change, to add more music diversity, you could say, to their albums and be much like other well known bands such as The Red Hot Chili Peppers, and the Beatles? Could the reason that it wasnt consitent, but had a new sound was because they wanted a change, to add more music diversity, you could say, to their albums and be much like other well known bands such as The Red Hot Chili Peppers, and the Beatles?

]]>